mot-r blog | avoiding stupidity at work

Your Legal Tech Won’t Save You from The Challenges of Change—But This Might.

Written by Mike Tobias | Jun 17, 2025 12:45:00 PM

 

Welcome to Legal Ops Briefs—inspired by the mot-r mindset, this blog series of 3-minute reads gives in-house Legal Ops quick, operational insights. Each post will explore the tech, trends, and tactics that boost operational effectiveness and ease legal team stress—without adding to the noise.

Change is inevitable in any organization—but for in-house legal teams, the pace and impact of change are particularly intense. From shifting KPIs to tech rollouts and regulatory waves, legal operations sit at the epicenter of organizational evolution. If your team’s tools and processes aren't built to accommodate both the predictable and the unexpected, burnout, inefficiency, and failure can take root fast.

So, how do you future-proof your legal tech investments and keep your team agile, engaged, and effective?

Step One: Embrace the Pace of Change in Legal Operations

Change isn’t the exception—it’s the default. Legal teams regularly experience shifts in personnel, policies, and priorities. Add in macro-level disruptors like remote work mandates, major client transitions, or new legal requirements, and it’s clear that agility isn’t optional.

Yet many legal departments still rely on outdated tools designed for stability, not adaptability. These rigid systems buckle under the weight of modern demands, creating hidden costs in the form of rework, resource waste, and lost momentum.

Step Two: Choose LegalTech That Solves Real Problems, Not Just Offers Features

Feature-rich tools may look impressive on spec sheets, but what really matters is how a solution impacts your team’s ability to do meaningful work—especially in a shifting environment.

That’s why outcome-based evaluation is key. Instead of building your decision around a checklist of “must-have” and “nice-to-have” features, start by identifying the actual problems your team is trying to solve. Are client requests disorganized? Are priorities unclear? Is work getting lost in email threads or informal channels?

Approaching technology through a “jobs to be done” lens helps ensure your investment supports the outcomes your team needs—like predictability, efficiency, and adaptability—not just surface-level functionality.

Step Three: Build an Evaluation Team Equipped for Change

Many legal tech projects falter not because of poor products, but because the wrong people are making the decisions. Traditional committees built around departmental roles (Legal, IT, Procurement) often lack the specialized competencies needed to choose a solution that will thrive over time.

To future-proof your tech decisions, assemble a competency-based team instead. Include voices with experience in legal workflows, change management, data security, and long-term tech planning. If a skill set is missing, supplement with outside consultants—or even GenAI—to stress-test your assumptions.

The key is to design a team that doesn’t just approve the solution, but understands the deeper operational implications of adopting it.

Step Four: Anticipate the Ripple Effects of LegalTech Decisions

Choosing new tech isn’t just about what happens on day one. Every solution introduces both benefits and trade-offs that unfold over time—some obvious, others less so.

While first-order effects might include faster contract cycles or cleaner interfaces, second- and third-order consequences often include login fatigue, data silos, onboarding costs, and unexpected integration work. If you don’t account for these ripple effects, even a well-intentioned investment can stall progress—or create new problems altogether.

Before committing, ask, “And then what?” And don’t stop until you’ve mapped out what success (and failure) might look like six months, one year, and two years after rollout.

Step Five: Use a Premortem to Spot Risks Before They Derail You

Even the most thoughtfully selected legal tech can fail if it’s not rolled out with intention. That’s where premortems come in. Instead of waiting to analyze what went wrong after the fact, premortems ask you to imagine a future in which the project failed—then reverse-engineer the reasons why.

This practice helps teams uncover blind spots, surface unspoken doubts, and build plans that proactively avoid common pitfalls. When paired with clear leadership buy-in and phased rollouts, premortems create a safety net for complex implementations.

 

Chime In. Be Heard.

Join the conversation. How are you preparing for change? Have you chosen tech that adapted well to shifting priorities, or struggled with tools that couldn’t keep up? What second- or third-order effects caught you off guard after a legal tech rollout?

Share your experience with future-proofing decisions, building the right evaluation teams, or making outcome-based choices. Your insights can help others steer clear of hidden pitfalls. Let’s make legal work—together.

 

 

mot-r is the Legal Work Orchestration solution for General Counsel. It is designed to reduce overwork and elevate legal service quality of legal teams of all sizes. With workflows, dashboards and granular reporting, it improves operational effectiveness and client service quality. Created by a team of enterprise software experts—who have a passion for reducing the human cost of legal work—mot-r is a trusted supplier to general counsel teams in financial services, healthcare, real estate, sports management and more. When you're ready to modernize how your in-house team works, we're ready to help.